Alle Beiträge von Tobias Steiner

Flyer: Transgressive Television

“Erstwhile in Vienna…”: Brief conference report on ‚Transgressive Television: Politics, Crime, and Citizenship in 21st-Century American TV Series‘ – An International Conference, 01.-03.10.2014, Amerika Haus, Vienna

The last three days have been a blast – I am just now on my way back from a visit to Vienna, Austria, where I attended the international conference “Transgressive Television”, and I am more than glad to have been part of a lively forum of Television Studies scholarship, which – contrary to many shouts about the death of Television – is as alive and kicking as the medium itself. Right from the start, what struck me as particularly interesting is the fact that, with only a fraction of the people present with a background in Film or Media Studies, Television Studies in Europe seems to generally be part more of the cultural and literary roots of American Studies.But back to the event: organized by Prof Birgit Däwes (University of Vienna) in cooperation with the Embassy of the United States in Austria, the conference provided a space for more than a dozen presentations that revolved around questions of transgression in regards to politics, power, representations of ethnicity and gender, the role of the anti-hero  and, in particular, the criminal exemplified on a diverse selection of both well-known as well as new contemporary TV shows including The Wire (HBO, 2002-8), Breaking Bad (AMC, 2008-13), The Sopranos (HBO, 1999-2007), House of Cards (Netflix, 2013-), Sons of Anarchy (FX, 2008-), Scandal (ABC, 2012-), Dexter (Showtime, 2006-13), Hannibal (NBC, 2013-), and True Detective (HBO, 2014-).

Keynote-Edgerton-2014-Vienna
Keynote by Prof Gary Edgerton
Image: (C) 2014, Embassy of the United States in Austria

The opening keynote held by one of Television Studies’ eminent scholars, Prof Gary Edgerton, provided an intriguing introduction to the world of what is now popularly known as “Quality Television” – although, as was voiced by many of the participants during the conference, the label is a controversial and contested one.

In his talk, Edgerton framed Television’s status quo with an amazingly multifaceted as well as detailed diachronic analysis of developments in the US TV industry during the last twenty years and its effects on a new way of producing as well as structuring television serials. Regarding the technology, Edgerton highlighted two aspects of the medium’s larger evolution that affect how television works today: an evolution from regional to national to international to global (through the corresponding carrier media such as network, cable, satellite and the internet), and an evolution from the massive TV set in the living room to a multiplicity of devices (smartphone, tablet, TV, etc.) that was facilitated through the unprecedented impact of the internet, which enabled television content to become streamable and opened up a multitude of ways of consumption.

Furthermore, Edgerton highlighted the emergence of a whole generation of showrunners during the 1990s, who learned their craft at the sets of a first generation of groundbreaking shows such as St. Elsewhere (NBC, 1982-8), Hill Street Blues (MTM/NBC, 1981-7) and Thirtysomething (ABC, 1987-91), and whom he labels “New Serialists”. According to Edgerton, many of these New Serialists, including now-famous showrunners such as David Chase, Matt Weiner, David Milch, and Tom Fontana, kick-started a more personal, more aesthetically complex and more morally ambiguous narrative style at the turn of the century and nowadays are the driving force behind much of contemporary successful serial television, a televisual form that Edgerton labeled “America’s Signature Art Form” during the first 15 years of the 21st century.

At this point, I will not delve deeper into the whole collection of presentations that followed during the next one and a half days – please make sure to visit tvseries.univie.ac.at for a detailed list of specific topics presented at the conference. To sum up the broad variety of television texts and approaches, I have to say that I found almost all of the presented perspectives – which oscillated between ‘close reading’-approaches of a single television text and shorter analyses of multiple texts in order to highlight an overarching issue or theme – to be highly valuable and intriguing examples of how television can be studied in 2014.

The closing roundtable discussion then served as the conference’s season finale, so to speak, and, apart from Birgit Däwes and Gary Edgerton, included two representatives of Austrian print journalism and the local television industry. Gary Edgerton opened up the debate with some conclusive remarks and further details on the future of television and, in particular, the role of Netflix and other DCPs (digital content providers) in the current media landscape and prophesied that television – if not in the form of technology – will surely continue to thrive as a cultural practice for at least the next half-century. Regarding the role of Netflix and others, Edgerton was skeptical about the longevity of their business model because of emerging new technological barriers that the industry will soon meet, since the current internet bandwidth usage in the US by Netflix users alone already amounts to 25% of all web traffic – and nobody knows what happens if the user numbers further increase and the repercussions that will have for the web traffic regulation and the internet per se.

From that starting point emerged a discussion on the notion of “Quality” that quickly centered on the international comparability of US vs. European productions and corresponding question regarding the output of European complex TV serials, which in comparison still struggles on the verge of non-existence. In that context, a perceived stark contrast on the European continent and of particularly Austrian and German television was highlighted, that, with an apparent mentality of Least Objectionable Programming that seems to be present in almost all of the networks (and, of course, with a small sample of notable examples to prove the rule), has much deeper structural problems to face than does the US American counterpart. Further comparisons between issues of success measurement in regards to ratings that, particularly in the European context, at the present moment fail to represent large groups of users that use other than the traditional ways to watch TV.

So, to conclude, this event has been a truly productive and amazingly interesting one, with a broad and diverse collection of perspectives on the role of contemporary television within the larger sociocultural context of today.

Tobias Steiner

Bremen-Ausflug im Januar 2014 zum Medienwissenschaftlichen Kolloquium Nordverbund

On Friday, January 17, 2014, a group of students and staff members of the IMK was given the great opportunity to attend this year’s first installment of the Nordverbund Kolloquium, a workshop format traditionally organized by a variety of members of Northern German universities, and usually hosted on a rotating basis at those participating universities.

This year’s installment was hosted by Professor John Bateman and Dr Heinz-Peter Preußer of Bremen University and included delegations from Bremen and Kiel universities. Meanwhile in Hamburg, a group of MA and PhD students gathered around Professor Thomas Weber and, with all of them being interested in what fellow students and staff in Bremen are currently working at, decided to also participate in the colloquium.

A group of six (Prof Thomas Weber, Dr Sigrun Lehnert, David Ziegenhagen, Irina Scheidgen, Henrik Wehmeyer, and your humble author of this piece), we met at Hamburg Central Station, took a train and then switched over to a local tramway that brought us directly onto the steps of Bremen University.

After having had initial trouble with finding the right location (those floors feel like mazes for an outsider!), we jumped right in and, after a few introductory words by John Bateman and Hans-Peter Preußer, heard Dr Jennifer Henke’s normative approach to the representation of science in graphic/novels and comics in her presentation „(R)Evolution im Comic? Zur Popularisierung von Naturwissenschaft in Graphic Adaptations“ (On the popularization of science in graphic adaptations), which was followed by an open-floor discussion.

The following slot was reserved for Prof John Bateman and Dr Janina Wildfeuer, who presented a newly-developed multi-modal analytical framework allowing for closer linguistic analysis of comic strips and graphic novels, taking into consideration the manifold relationships and multilayered workings between different elements and levels of comic strip language and semiotics. Due to a late start, the following discussion round had to be kept rather brief, but was continued on a more informal level when all participants went for a lunch break, which was held at one of Bremen University’s cafeterias.

After a nourishing lunch break, Prof Matthis Kepser – with his talk „Der Bergfilm. Typologie eines produktiven Sujets“ – introduced the audience to the movie genre of what is generally labelled „Bergfilm“ aka. „Mountain Movie“ and focuses on movies that have as their core subject the struggle between man and mountain, including films such as Louis Trenker’s „Berg des Schicksals“/“Mountain of Destiny“ (1924), different takes on „Nanga Parbat“ by Frank Leberecht, Hans Ertl, Donald Shebib and Joseph Vilsmayer (1936, 1953, 1986, 2010) or post-/modern takes on the subject such as Pepe Danquart’s „Am Limit“/“To the Limit“ (2007) or Danny Boyle’s „127 Hours“ (2010).

Following a stimulated discussion about the influence of James Bond on the Bergfilm genre and other Bergfilm-related questions, Benjamin Moldenhauer introduced the audience to his current research project on Horror and self-reflexivity in „‚Pigs will get what pigs deserve‘: Horror und Selbstreflexivität in Joss Whedons Cabin in the Woods„.

A short coffee break then led over to the last slot of presentations, which begun with Dr André Steiner’s approach to the topic of identity loss in movies in his talk „Identitätsdiffusion im Film: Rezeptive Orientierungslosigkeit von Der Student von Prag bis Inland Empire„.

Dr Janina Wildfeuer and Felix Engel concluded the colloquium with a presentation on „Musiksemiotik in Christopher Nolans Inception„, which introduced an approach to the use of music and sound as a means to semiotically link parts of a movie narrative which was exemplified by an analysis of the use of sound snippets of Edith Piaf’s „Non, je ne regrette rien“ within the narrative of Nolan’s Inception (2010).

With the end of the formal colloquium, all participants then relocated to an Italian restaurant, where the whole group joined in for a bit of pizza, pasta and wine. Later, our small group of Hamburgians left in order to catch the last train to Hamburg – and was very glad to have been given the opportunity to participate in such an interesting, interdisciplinary format!

Tobias Steiner

Steiner, Tobias

Tobias Steiner studied American Studies and Television Studies in Hamburg (UHH) and London (Birkbeck, U of London).

He now is a PhD candidate at Universität Hamburg’s Department of English and American Studies. His PhD project (working title: “US Television’s (Hi)Stories of Transnational Pasts: Serial TV Drama as Medium of Cultural Memory”) focuses on an integration of the televisual medium into the context of Cultural Memory Studies through an analysis of  US-American television series.

Parallel to that, he works as a research fellow at Universität Hamburg’s Universitätskolleg, and has been teaching American Television history at the university’s Department for Media and Communications.

Tobias currently acts as postgraduate representative of ECREA’s Television Studies section and is enthusiastic about all things Complex television, both as a fan and a Cultural Studies-focused academic.

  • BA American Studies, University of Hamburg
  • MA Television Studies, Birkbeck, University of London
    • MA dissertation: „Dealing with a Nation’s Trauma: Allegories on 9/11 in Contemporary U.S. Television Drama Narratives and the case of ‚Homeland'“, accessible at Academia.edu

Areas of Research

Cultural Studies, Television Studies, American Studies, Cultural Memory Studies, Television and Society, Visual Media and Culture, Media Convergence, Transmedia Storytelling

Member in the following associations:

Presentations

„Nazi flags on Times Square! Obverted Nostalgia and the Renegotiation of Cultural Memory in popular U.S. Alternate History TV drama“, Nov 10, 2016 @ GHIL workshop Pop Nostalgia: The Uses of the Past in Popular Culture, German Historical Institute London, UK. [Program: GHIL conference program]

„Variations on a Theme: Nordic Noir, Bron/Broen, and Glocalization“, June 22, 2015 @TV in the Age of Transnationalisation and Transmedialisation, University of Roehampton, London, UK. Organized by ECREA Television Studies section and the Media Across Borders network. [Program: Program]

„Blockbuster Tales of Days Past! Renegotiation of History in Fictional U.S. TV Drama from the 1940s up to today“, June 19, 2015 @9th NECS Conference, Łódź, Poland.

„Historiographie mal anders? Verhandlung von Geschichte in fiktionalen US-Fernsehformaten von den 1940ern bis heute“, March 31, 2015 @28. Film- und Fernsehwissenschaftliches Kolloquium, University of Mannheim.
[Program: 28. FFK, Mannheim | Abstract: FFK Abstracts]

„‘I can’t let that happen again’: Trauma, TV and the Cultural Forum – Allegories on 9/11 in US Television Drama“ – Part of the Lecture Series Life/Rupture: Conflict Resolution and the Poetics of (Dis)Continuity, Jan 15, 2015 at University of Hamburg.

„US Television’s (Hi)Stories of Transnational Pasts: Serielles US-Fernsehdrama als Medium des Kulturellen Gedächtnisses und eine kurze Geschichte der Geschichte im Fernsehen“ (18.11.2014). PhD project presentation @Kolloquium der FFF (Arbeitsstelle Film- und Fernsehforschung), Hamburg.

„‚See It Now!‘ Eine Geschichte der Geschichte in fiktionalen US-Fernsehformaten“, Dec 12/13, 2014 @10. medienwissenschaftliches Kolloquium des Nordverbunds, University of Hamburg. [Program]

„Serial TV Drama as Medium of Cultural Memory and the History of History on TV“, Oct 11, 2014 @PGF of the DGfA, University of Mainz

Teaching

Seminar: „TV or not TV? Historical Development of US American Serial Television from the 1950s up to today // Historische Entwicklung US-amerikanischer Fernsehserien von 1950 bis heute“, Winter semester 2013/14.

Publications